Are India and Bangladesh's trade restrictions on each other a sign of growing tensions between them?
Are India
and Bangladesh's trade restrictions on each other a sign of growing tensions
between them?
After months
of rhetoric, India and Bangladesh have recently imposed trade sanctions on each
other, raising fears of a major disruption to trade between the two countries.
Last month,
Bangladesh decided to restrict imports of cotton yarn from India via land
routes to protect local industries from the impact of cheap foreign products.
Dhaka’s
decision came at a time when India abruptly announced the end of the facility
provided to Bangladesh under which Bangladeshi products were exported abroad
through Indian ports and airports.
India has
cited the increasing rush of trade goods at its airports and ports as the
reason for this decision.
It should be
noted that bilateral relations between the two countries have been strained
since the fall of the government of former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh
Hasina Wajid in August 2024. Sheikh Hasina has been in India since her ouster,
while Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus is leading an interim government in
Bangladesh.
Bangladesh
has also repeatedly demanded India's extradition of Sheikh Hasina Wajid so that
the court proceedings pending against her in Bangladesh can be completed.
Sheikh Hasina has been accused of money laundering and corruption, as well as
involvement in serious crimes. Hasina Wajid has denied the charges, while India
has never formally responded to Bangladesh's demand for her extradition.
The ongoing
tension and tension between the two countries are causing losses to business
companies. Cotton yarn is an indispensable raw material for the garment
industry in Bangladesh and is still brought to Bangladesh from India by sea and
air routes.
In 2024,
India exported $1.6 billion worth of cotton yarn to Bangladesh. In the past,
India used to facilitate Bangladeshi exporters to send garments manufactured
for big brands by road to Indian cities from where they were dispatched to
Europe and the US.
Anis Ahmed
is the head of supply chain at MGH Group. He says this is a major setback for
Bangladesh’s export industry. His company manufactures products for well-known
brands like Zara.
He says that
goods used to reach their destination via India in a week, while it took eight
weeks by sea.
It should be
remembered that Bangladesh is the second largest exporter of garments in the
world after China, which exported $38 billion worth of garments last year
alone.
According to
Anis Ahmed, about $1 billion of this was sent via India and this route was
gradually becoming a priority.
Many in
Bangladesh are blaming India for the closure of the facility on remarks made by
Mohammad Yunus during his recent visit to China.
He said
Bangladesh was a maritime protectorate for India’s northeast and suggested that
the region could be a breeding ground for Chinese economic growth. His remarks
were widely criticized by the leaders of India’s northeastern states.
Highlighting
India’s strategic weakness in the region, Mohammad Yunus’s remarks have raised
alarm bells in Delhi.
India’s
northeast is connected to China through the 20-km-wide Siliguri Corridor.
With a
history of border tensions and a loss in the 1962 war, India’s defense planners
fear that China could target the corridor in any future conflict to cut off the
northeastern states from the rest of the country.
But analysts
in Bangladesh say Yunus's remarks were misinterpreted and aimed at promoting
regional connectivity.
During
Yunus's visit to China, Dhaka also welcomed Beijing's interest in a $1 billion
Teesta River project in northern Bangladesh.
Indian
analysts have warned that China's involvement in the project, which is not far
from the Siliguri Corridor, could be a source of concern for Delhi.
But both
countries are concerned about the strained ties.
Bangladesh
is increasingly angry about India's strict visa rules since Sheikh Hasina was
ousted.
Two million
Bangladeshis used to visit India every year for tourism, business, education
and medical purposes, but local media reports say the number of visas issued
daily has fallen by more than 80 percent in the past few months.
Sheikh
Hasina's stay in India and Bangladesh's demand for her extradition are a key
issue.
“Bangladesh
should understand that we will never hand over Sheikh Hasina to them because we
know what will happen if we do so,” says former Indian foreign secretary Shyam
Saran.
Amid growing
tensions with Bangladesh, the Indian Garment Manufacturers Association has
decided to ban the import of Bangladeshi garments by land.
Bangladeshi
analysts have warned that further trade barriers could prove detrimental.
“There is a
view in Bangladesh today that we should re-evaluate the transit and delivery
facilities given to India by the Sheikh Hasina government,” says Debapriya
Bhattacharya, a senior economist at the Centre for Policy Dialogue in Dhaka.
India uses
Bangladesh's ports, roads and waterways to transport goods to its northeastern
states, but officials say the volume of transit has not yet reached the
expected level.
Bangladesh's
tensions with India are rising at a time when Bangladesh's relations with
Pakistan are improving.
Bangladesh,
formerly East Pakistan, fought a war of independence in 1971 with India's
support. Relations between Pakistan and Bangladesh have been frosty during Sheikh
Hasina's 15-year rule.
Last month,
Pakistan's Foreign Secretary Amina Baloch visited Bangladesh, the first major
visit of her kind in 15 years. In addition, Pakistan's Deputy Prime Minister
Ishaq Dar was also about to visit Bangladesh when tensions arose between India
and Pakistan after the Pahalgam attack and the visit had to be postponed.
“I don’t think India is worried about Dhaka’s
leaning towards Pakistan, but if they are going to work together and make
things difficult for India, then obviously that will raise concerns,” says
Shyam Saran.
The strong
official reactions from both countries are also affecting public opinion in
India and Bangladesh. Anti-India sentiment in Bangladesh is growing as the
Indian media is accused of exaggerating attacks on minorities in Bangladesh and
the Islamist threat.
The
people-to-people ties built over the years appear to be fraying, and analysts
say their actions could damage trade and economic ties if the parties fail to
remain peaceful.
Post a Comment