Trump's 'unprecedented show of power' in first 100 days: Decisions that changed the course of politics in Washington
Trump's
'unprecedented show of power' in first 100 days: Decisions that changed the
course of politics in Washington
During his
presidential campaign last year, Donald Trump repeatedly expressed his
intentions to bring dramatic change to the country as soon as he took office.
But few
expected it to happen so quickly.
Within three
months of being sworn in as the 47th President of the United States, he has
exercised his powers in a way that few other American presidents have done
before.
His
decisions, signatures, and policy announcements have made headlines on social
media. His executive orders have affected every aspect of American life.
Even
President Trump’s supporters are surprised and concerned by his decisions, as
he emerges as a president who is delivering on his promises and implementing
long-awaited reforms.
But his
critics fear he is causing irreparable harm to the country and overstepping his
authority - crippling key government agencies or sectors and perhaps permanently
changing the American presidency in the process.
Let's take a
look at six key actions President Trump has taken in his recent first 100 days
in office.
Day 20
and Presidential Powers: A Social Media Post That Sparked a Constitutional
Storm
Trump was
only three weeks into his new term when US Vice President JD Vance posted a
nine-word tweet on Sunday morning that hinted at the Trump administration's
second-term strategy.
He wrote on
social media platform X that "judges are not allowed to take executive
powers into their own hands."
This led to
a media outcry as legal experts lined up to challenge the claim, pointing to a
220-year-old principle of American history that is considered central to
American democracy.
Accordingly,
the courts have the authority to review any government action, law, or
executive order that they believe violates the U.S. Constitution.
J.D. Vance's
words were an open challenge to the powers of the judiciary and, at first
glance, a challenge to the three main and equal branches of government of the
American system, which were founded by the Founding Fathers of the United
States.
But Trump
and his team not only stood by their statement of challenging the separation of
powers between Congress, the judiciary, and the presidency and the interference
of the other two branches in presidential decisions, but they did not apologize
for it.
The White
House has aggressively tried to gain control over spending from Congress,
cutting funding for various projects, programs, and even several institutions.
Trump’s
aggressive moves have been met with silence on Capitol Hill, even though his
Republican Party holds a slim majority in both houses.
The courts
have been the most resistant to all of this, according to a New York Times
review, with more than 100 rulings so far blocking presidential actions they
say are unconstitutional.
Trump’s
immigration crackdown has been the most contentious. In March, more than 200
Venezuelans deemed a threat to the United States were deported to El Salvador,
many of them under war powers and without due process.
A
Republican-appointed judge on the federal appeals courts said he was “shocked”
by the steps the White House has taken.
Judge J.
Harvey Wilkinson wrote that “the two institutions (the judiciary and the
presidency) have gone so far in a conflict against each other that it will not
only cause irreparable harm but may undermine the authority and power of both.”
Trump and
White House officials have said they will comply with court decisions.
Meanwhile, President Trump criticizes many of the judges who issue those
decisions, and the administration has sometimes slowed down the implementation
of those decisions.
All of this
amounts to a unique test of a constitutional system that has been operating
under a certain method for centuries. While Trump has been at the center of it.
The real
driver of this chaos is himself, a man who was not born in America, but who
built a business empire there.
Day 32,
government spending cuts and a man in black waving a saw
Clad in
head-to-toe black and wearing dark glasses, Elon Musk stood on stage to the
crowd at the Conservative Political Action Conference, praising Trump. The
world's richest man made a surprise announcement, saying he wanted to cut
trillions of dollars in federal government spending.
At that
moment, Argentine President Javier Mellí, known for his budget cuts, appeared
from behind the stage and handed Elon Musk a shiny saw.
"This
is a saw that runs on bureaucracy," Musk said excitedly.
It was not
only a dramatic display of the work being done under the Department of
Government Efficiency, a department given to him under the Trump
administration, but also a testament to the South African-born technologist's
loyalty to Trump.
Since then, Musk
has issued various orders to the federal government, including urging the
government to obtain sensitive government information and identifying projects
that should be eliminated.
While he has
not yet come close to delivering on his pledge to save trillions of dollars, he
has made cuts to several government agencies and departments, including the
U.S. Department of Education and the USAID program.
While
promises to reduce “waste, fraud, and waste” in government and reduce the
growing federal deficit generally appeal to a broad audience, the way Musk
brandished his saw has sparked controversy with top government officials and
angered some Americans.
While some
Trump supporters have praised his administration’s spending cuts, Republicans
in some quarters have faced criticism from the public at town halls.
Critics have
expressed concern that it could severely impact the government's Social
Security retirement plan, veterans' benefits, and health insurance.
Their
concerns are not unfounded, as these government schemes account for a large
portion of federal spending.
If these
programs are not cut, Trump's massive tax cuts would further increase the US
government's debt and jeopardize his biggest campaign promise of "economic
prosperity."
Day 72
and the economy: ‘Trillions were lost before my eyes’
When
businessman Richard McDonald saw Trump holding up a list of countries on the
White House lawn that were being hit with new US tariffs, he knew he had to do
something fast.
“I jumped
because I was just expecting an announcement, I wasn’t expecting a list written
on a board,” he says.
He had
expected a 10 to 20 percent tariff, but he says “nobody expected that much.”
He had to
quickly identify which companies would be most affected and then sell them.
“Billions of
dollars were being lost every minute as the value of companies’ shares
fluctuated, so you had to make quick decisions.”
He is one of
many traders who have been hit hard by the plunge in global stock markets since
Trump announced his so-called "Independence Day" tariffs.
The S&P
500 index, which includes large companies, has been the worst hit in the US
stock market, and even now the Trump administration has withdrawn some of its
decisions on high tax tariffs, but the market has not yet recovered.
The economy
was the biggest concern for American voters in the November election, and Trump
reached the White House only after criticizing Biden's policy on combating
inflation.
His promise
to reduce prices, simplify government regulations and promote domestic industry
was welcomed by Wall Street and many American companies.
But now that
Trump is fulfilling his new tariff promises, it has had a clear impact on the
prices of goods and this is hurting the public, at least in the short term.
The stock
market is plunging, interest rates and home loan rates are rising, and American
consumer confidence is waning. Unemployment is also a problem in the country,
and some have been laid off there as the number of federal employees has
increased.
The US
Federal Reserve and some other economists have warned that Trump's plan will
affect the country's economic growth and could lead to a recession.
While
President Trump's popularity has declined over his measures to manage the
economy, many of his supporters still support him. And in former industrial
areas that were emptied by the loss of manufacturing, there is now hope that
the newly imposed tariffs will restore global balance.
Referring to
the tariffs on China, Pennsylvania truck driver Ben Maurer says, "Trump
has earned respect. We are still a force to be reckoned with."
Concerns
over economic issues have had an overall impact on Trump's polls, but there is
another key issue where he has greater public support, and that is immigration.
Day 58,
Immigration: ‘The young man in the handcuffs is my son’
‘That’s him!
That’s him! I recognize him.’ That’s what Mairellis Cacique López says,
pointing to a photo of men shackled and handcuffed on the floor of one of the
world’s most notorious prisons.
She has
identified her son in the photo. The photo is taken from above and shows bald
men sitting in a row in white T-shirts.
She was
shown the photo by a BBC reporter at her home in Venezuela and the photo was
officially released by El Salvadoran authorities.
When she
last heard from her son, he was in the US and was being deported back to
Venezuela, but now he is 1,430 miles away in a notorious prison in El Salvador,
sent there by US authorities.
The Trump
administration says they are members of the powerful international mafia gang
Trait de Aragón, while Mairelis Cacique says his son is innocent.
A tough
stance on immigration was a central plank of Trump’s re-election campaign, and
the president has used his sweeping powers to make good on that pledge.
Illegal
border crossings were falling toward the end of Biden’s presidency but are now
at their lowest in more than four years.
The
crackdown is widely supported by the American public, but it is having a
devastating impact on international students.
Some of
those who had permanent residency have been detained, while others have been
deported because they were involved in pro-Palestinian protests. They have
denied accusations that they are Hamas supporters.
Civil rights
advocates have warned that some immigrants are being deported without any
action.
While there
have been no mass deportations so far, as some had hoped and others feared,
newly empowered immigration enforcement agents have raided businesses, homes,
and churches across the United States.
They have
also been active at universities, which have become prominent targets of
President Trump in many other ways.
Day 91:
Confrontation with academia, media, and corporations
On April 21,
Harvard University President Alan Garber decided to take on the White House.
In a letter
to the university community, he announced a lawsuit challenging the Trump
administration’s move to freeze billions of dollars in federal grants.
He said it
was an illegal move and an “unprecedented exercise of undue authority” in
Harvard’s affairs.
The White
House has said it had to take action because Harvard has failed to address
anti-Semitic sentiment on campus. Garber says it is an issue the university is
taking steps to address.
But the Ivy
League college’s move was the most significant show of resistance to Trump’s
use of presidential powers to target American higher education.
The
president and his officials have threatened to cut off billions of dollars in
funding to higher education institutions like Harvard, which the president and
his supporters believe foster liberal thought among students.
This month,
Columbia University in New York City agreed to some of the White House’s
demands, including changes to its protest policy, campus security practices,
and Middle East departments.
Trump has
tried to do the same in the media and corporate world.
Trump has
used the blocking of federal contracts to pressure law firms to hire and
represent more conservatives.
Some firms
have responded to the Trump administration by offering millions of dollars in
free legal services, while two firms have filed lawsuits challenging the
constitutionality of the administration’s sanctions.
Trump sued
ABC News for defamation, prompting the media company to donate $15 million to
the Trump Presidential Foundation.
Similarly,
CBC is in talks to settle a lawsuit with Trump over an interview with Kamala
Harris, as its parent company Paramount needs federal approval to merge with
Skydance Media.
The
Associated Press, by contrast, has resisted the president's proposal to rename
it "Gulf of America."
During the
campaign, Trump warned about the power of the federal government. Now in
office, he is wielding that power in a way no previous president has attempted.
But the
impact of his actions has been felt no further than in the federal agencies and
departments he now controls.
Attack on
diversity programs and the question of future political legacy
The White
House press conference began with a moment of silence for the victims of the
plane-helicopter collision on the Potomac River.
Within
moments, the silence was broken and Trump was being heavily criticized.
The
president had claimed that diversity and ethnic diversity at the Federal
Aviation Agency were to blame for the crash because the agency hires people
with various cognitive disabilities as air traffic controllers. However, he
provided no evidence for this.
It was a
shocking moment that symbolized the attack that his presidency has launched on
social diversity programs that have spread throughout the US government and the
corporate world in recent years.
Trump has
directed the federal government to end its diversity and equity projects or
programs and investigate private companies and educational institutions that
are thought to be engaged in "illegal social diversity promotion."
His
directive has sparked moves to reduce or eliminate these programs among leading
global companies like Meta and Goldman. The first was an attempt to expand
opportunities for black Americans in a cultural diversity initiative introduced
in the 1960s during the civil rights movement. They later expanded to include
women, LGBT rights, and other racial groups.
Much of
corporate America has embraced the efforts and embraced them in the wake of the
Black Lives Matter protests following the death of George Floyd, a black man,
at the hands of police officers in 2020.
But critics
say the race-based opportunity movement prioritizes politics and race over
ability, creating a divide that has no place in modern America.
While
Trump’s orders have little support in society, many are concerned about their
impact.
Arlington
National Cemetery has removed all black service members from its website.
Similarly, the Pentagon is being asked to remove the name of the Enola Gay from
its records because it contains the word “gay,” which is associated with
homosexuality. It was the ship that dropped the atomic bomb on Japan.
Donald
Trump’s first 100 days in office have been a display of unilateral power that
is unparalleled in recent American history.
His efforts
to dismantle a large part of the federal government will take years, if not
decades, for subsequent presidents to reverse.
In other
ways, however, Trump’s efforts so far may be less permanent. Without the
support of new laws passed by Congress, many of his sweeping reforms could be
undone by future presidents.
The thin
Republican majority in Congress will try to provide legislative support for
Trump’s agenda later this year, but their success is not guaranteed.
And in next
year’s midterm congressional elections, those majorities could be replaced by
opposition Democrats bent on scrutinizing the Trump administration and reducing
its authority.
In the
meantime, further confrontations with the judiciary and conservatism on the
Supreme Court could hinder Trump’s efforts.
The first
100 days of Trump’s second term have been dramatic, demonstrating his political
strength, but the real challenge will be the next 1,361 days, in which he will
see whether he can leave a political legacy.
Post a Comment