'If they knew history, they wouldn't have taken pictures here': US Secretary of State Marco Rubio mocks Taj Mahal and Iranian embassy

 

'If they knew history, they wouldn't have taken pictures here': US Secretary of State Marco Rubio mocks Taj Mahal and Iranian embassy

 

 

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has returned from a four-day visit to India, but his visit is still a topic of discussion on social media.

The debate began when he posed for photos with his wife in front of the Taj Mahal in Agra. Iranian officials first reacted sarcastically to this, after which the matter gained more attention.

Later, when Marco Rubio left for his return, there was no prominent politician or senior diplomat present at the airport to see him off, to which social media users started raising questions about the quality of his reception and protocol.

A user named Sheshpal Vaid wrote on social media, “The Modi government has reduced the status of the US Secretary of State, who is considered the third most powerful official in the world’s only superpower, to the level of a police station SHO. At least I have not seen such indecent treatment of the US Secretary of State before. How is this a response to Trump's 'shithole' statement?'

On April 23, US President Donald Trump 'reposted' a statement on the right to citizenship at birth in the US in a social media post that was heavily criticized by opposition parties and users in India.

On the other hand, political leader Abhishek Singhvi wrote that ‘If the US adopts a strategy of pressure against India, it should not expect red carpet diplomacy in return.’

According to him, ‘The relatively low-level protocol for Marco Rubio is a reminder that respect must be mutual in international relations, and India sees itself not as a subject state but as an equal partner.’

Another social media user Ganesh opined that ‘Only SHO, constable, sub-inspector and a few lower-ranking officials were present to see off Marco Rubio, who is considered one of the most powerful people in the world, from Jaipur, while no minister-level official attended. This is being described as one of the coldest receptions ever for a top American official.’

A user named Salil Mathur offered a different perspective, writing, “Although the protocol was apparently appropriate, Marco Rubio’s reception felt somewhat cold. In my opinion, the message being sent to the US was absolutely right.”

Former Lt. Col. Sushil Singh Chevran wrote, “Marco Rubio is the US Secretary of State. The informal behavior of the uniformed personnel deployed to see him off does not reflect well on the Indian Armed Forces. You may not be happy with America, but such a poor presentation should not be made to the world. You are not just representing your force, you are also representing your country.”

Another user, who runs a Shivam account under the name ‘Constitutional Daco’, commented on the visit, saying, “Minimum diplomatic protocol was maintained, but no extra privileges or warmth were shown. Moreover, Rubio was also kept in the scorching heat of 45 degrees. On what basis was the Agra program scheduled for 11:30 am and Jaipur for 2:45 pm? It seems that they were deliberately put in a difficult situation.

A user named Avinash Shishu wrote in his opinion: “I think something must have happened between India and America that has not come to the fore in public. Otherwise Marco Rubio would not have faced such a cold reception. Even if Asim Munir had come on the visit, he would have been welcomed much better.”

A user named Ned Donovan, who belongs to the police service, wrote that “The official farewell given to the US Secretary of State by the sub-inspector of the nearby police station is undoubtedly a rich Indian style.”

Taj Mahal visit, Iranian satire and social media debate

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio visited the Taj Mahal in Agra during his visit to India and shared memorable photos with his wife on social media. It was apparently a routine diplomatic and cultural visit, but the photos soon became the center of discussion on social media.

The matter intensified when the Iranian Consulate in the Indian city of Hyderabad openly mocked Rubio’s visit to the Taj Mahal.

The Iranian Consulate reminded in its statement that the Taj Mahal is a monument to the love of the Mughal emperor for the Iranian-born queen Mumtaz Mahal, and its construction involved the skill of Persian architects.

The statement also criticized Washington and accused the US government of double standards. According to the consulate, on the one hand, the US talks about eradicating Iranian civilization, while on the other hand, its officials seem to praise the historical heritage of the same civilization abroad.

The Iranian reaction on social media has not only limited the debate to historical dimensions, but has also given it a political dimension. The debate comes at a time when relations between the United States and Iran are tense, and statements from both countries are often prominent on social media.

Taj Mahal

The marble Taj Mahal is one of the wonders of the world, built by the Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan in the 17th century in love with his wife Mumtaz Mahal. Mumtaz Mahal and Shah Jahan are buried here.

Mumtaz was Shah Jahan's third and most beloved wife and their love story is a unique story.

It is generally believed that Mumtaz was a very beautiful and educated spouse, but she also had a disagreement with her husband over the issue of having too many children.

Mumtaz Mahal died of hemorrhage on June 17, 1631, at the age of 38, during her fourteenth pregnancy, just 19 years after their marriage.

According to historians, the Taj Mahal was built between 1632 and 1648. Historian Rana Safavi has written that the emperor's official historian Abdul Hamid Lahori, while mentioning its construction in his book 'Baadshah Nama', wrote that 'the construction of the Mausoleum of the Holy Prophet (Taj Mahal) began with the laying of its foundation.'

Rana Safavi further wrote that historian R. Nath wrote in his book 'Taj Mahal: History and Architect' that 'the emperor decided to build such a magnificent building with a large dome over the tomb of Mumtaz Mahal that would remain until the Day of Judgment and which would be in accordance with his power and glory. Which would make the memory of Mumtaz Mahal eternal. Shah Jahan laid the foundation of such a great tomb.'

In the past, several BJP leaders have said that the Taj Mahal is actually a Hindu temple.

 

 

The debate began when he posed for photos with his wife in front of the Taj Mahal in Agra. Iranian officials first reacted sarcastically to this, after which the matter gained more attention.

Later, when Marco Rubio left for his return, there was no prominent politician or senior diplomat present at the airport to see him off, to which social media users started raising questions about the quality of his reception and protocol.

A user named Sheshpal Vaid wrote on social media, “The Modi government has reduced the status of the US Secretary of State, who is considered the third most powerful official in the world’s only superpower, to the level of a police station SHO. At least I have not seen such indecent treatment of the US Secretary of State before. How is this a response to Trump's 'shithole' statement?'

On April 23, US President Donald Trump 'reposted' a statement on the right to citizenship at birth in the US in a social media post that was heavily criticized by opposition parties and users in India.

On the other hand, political leader Abhishek Singhvi wrote that ‘If the US adopts a strategy of pressure against India, it should not expect red carpet diplomacy in return.’

According to him, ‘The relatively low-level protocol for Marco Rubio is a reminder that respect must be mutual in international relations, and India sees itself not as a subject state but as an equal partner.’

Another social media user Ganesh opined that ‘Only SHO, constable, sub-inspector and a few lower-ranking officials were present to see off Marco Rubio, who is considered one of the most powerful people in the world, from Jaipur, while no minister-level official attended. This is being described as one of the coldest receptions ever for a top American official.’

A user named Salil Mathur offered a different perspective, writing, “Although the protocol was apparently appropriate, Marco Rubio’s reception felt somewhat cold. In my opinion, the message being sent to the US was absolutely right.”

Former Lt. Col. Sushil Singh Chevran wrote, “Marco Rubio is the US Secretary of State. The informal behavior of the uniformed personnel deployed to see him off does not reflect well on the Indian Armed Forces. You may not be happy with America, but such a poor presentation should not be made to the world. You are not just representing your force, you are also representing your country.”

Another user, who runs a Shivam account under the name ‘Constitutional Daco’, commented on the visit, saying, “Minimum diplomatic protocol was maintained, but no extra privileges or warmth were shown. Moreover, Rubio was also kept in the scorching heat of 45 degrees. On what basis was the Agra program scheduled for 11:30 am and Jaipur for 2:45 pm? It seems that they were deliberately put in a difficult situation.

A user named Avinash Shishu wrote in his opinion: “I think something must have happened between India and America that has not come to the fore in public. Otherwise Marco Rubio would not have faced such a cold reception. Even if Asim Munir had come on the visit, he would have been welcomed much better.”

A user named Ned Donovan, who belongs to the police service, wrote that “The official farewell given to the US Secretary of State by the sub-inspector of the nearby police station is undoubtedly a rich Indian style.”

Taj Mahal visit, Iranian satire and social media debate

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio visited the Taj Mahal in Agra during his visit to India and shared memorable photos with his wife on social media. It was apparently a routine diplomatic and cultural visit, but the photos soon became the center of discussion on social media.

The matter intensified when the Iranian Consulate in the Indian city of Hyderabad openly mocked Rubio’s visit to the Taj Mahal.

The Iranian Consulate reminded in its statement that the Taj Mahal is a monument to the love of the Mughal emperor for the Iranian-born queen Mumtaz Mahal, and its construction involved the skill of Persian architects.

The statement also criticized Washington and accused the US government of double standards. According to the consulate, on the one hand, the US talks about eradicating Iranian civilization, while on the other hand, its officials seem to praise the historical heritage of the same civilization abroad.

The Iranian reaction on social media has not only limited the debate to historical dimensions, but has also given it a political dimension. The debate comes at a time when relations between the United States and Iran are tense, and statements from both countries are often prominent on social media.

Taj Mahal

The marble Taj Mahal is one of the wonders of the world, built by the Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan in the 17th century in love with his wife Mumtaz Mahal. Mumtaz Mahal and Shah Jahan are buried here.

Mumtaz was Shah Jahan's third and most beloved wife and their love story is a unique story.

It is generally believed that Mumtaz was a very beautiful and educated spouse, but she also had a disagreement with her husband over the issue of having too many children.

Mumtaz Mahal died of hemorrhage on June 17, 1631, at the age of 38, during her fourteenth pregnancy, just 19 years after their marriage.

According to historians, the Taj Mahal was built between 1632 and 1648. Historian Rana Safavi has written that the emperor's official historian Abdul Hamid Lahori, while mentioning its construction in his book 'Baadshah Nama', wrote that 'the construction of the Mausoleum of the Holy Prophet (Taj Mahal) began with the laying of its foundation.'

Rana Safavi further wrote that historian R. Nath wrote in his book 'Taj Mahal: History and Architect' that 'the emperor decided to build such a magnificent building with a large dome over the tomb of Mumtaz Mahal that would remain until the Day of Judgment and which would be in accordance with his power and glory. Which would make the memory of Mumtaz Mahal eternal. Shah Jahan laid the foundation of such a great tomb.'

In the past, several BJP leaders have said that the Taj Mahal is actually a Hindu temple.